Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has ordered the country’s attorney general and the head of the Shin Bet security service to identify the soldiers and officers interviewed in the investigative documentary NAZA and prosecute them for causing “harm to Israel’s diplomatic and security interests.” The award-winning documentary, directed by Oscar-winning filmmakers Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor and produced by the Guardian, details Israel’s mass killing of civilians in Gaza. The film is showing in cinemas, including in the UK and the US, and will be screened in more than 50 countries. In a letter addressed to Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara, IDF Chief of Staff Lt Gen Eyal Zamir, and Shin Bet head David Zini, the Israeli prime minister demanded they “act urgently to uncover the identity of all those who are involved or appear in the libel film.” Netanyahu also called for “the opening of a criminal investigation and prosecution for serious information security offences, criminal defamation, and harming Israel’s diplomatic and security interests.” NAZA premiered last month at the Venice international film festival, where it won the special jury prize after receiving the longest ovation in the event’s history. It takes its name from an acronym used euphemistically by Israeli intelligence to indicate how many civilians it expects to be killed in an airstrike. NAZA’s directors, Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor, won the special jury prize at the Venice film festival last month. Photograph: Capital Pictures/Alamy Stock Photo/Alamy Live News. The Israeli government has fiercely attacked Abraham and Szor, threatening to strip them of their citizenship and accusing them of treason. Government supporters have vowed to hound the filmmakers on their return to Israel and picketed Szor’s parents’ home in Savyon, chanting: “Death sentence to traitors.” Zamir denounced the film as an “attack on the state of Israel,” accusing it of spreading “lies and blood libels.” He had earlier ordered military and legal officials to identify the soldiers featured and examine possible legal action against them. However, the military advocate general, Itai Ofir, said criminal prosecution would require evidence of security violations or disclosure of classified material, although disciplinary measures remained possible. The protection of journalistic sources is a cornerstone of press freedom under international human rights standards and disclosure orders are permitted only under stringent conditions. Ricardo Gutiérrez, the general secretary of the European Federation of Journalists, representing over 320,000 journalists, said: “These threats constitute a blatant act of intimidation against journalists who have simply been doing their job, in strict accordance with ethical standards and in the public interest. I am not surprised by this outburst, which confirms that this regime is prepared to do anything to cover up its crimes against humanity and the ongoing genocide in Gaza.” A Guardian spokesperson said: “After first threatening to strip NAZA’s directors of their Israeli citizenship, the Israeli government is now calling for an investigation into their journalistic sources. These moves are all attempts to distract from the urgent questions the film asks about the mass killings of Palestinian civilians in Gaza. Journalists should be free to pursue public interest investigations without threats or harassment.” Graffiti depicting Abraham and Szor, and the word ‘traitors’ in Hebrew, appeared on a wall in Ashdod, southern Israel, after NAZA was awarded the special jury prize at the Venice film festival. Photograph: Amir Cohen/Reuters NAZA builds on revelations first published by the Israeli-Palestinian publication +972 Magazine, the Hebrew-language outlet Local Call and the Guardian between 2023 and 2025. Earlier this month, a Guardian spokesperson saidThe process of assessing the credibility of the testimonies was rigorous. It included leaked classified documents, detailed verification of specific strikes, and corroboration through a wider pool of confidential journalistic sources who did not appear on camera in the film. Over the past three years, the team behind the film has interviewed more than 100 sources familiar with IDF systems used in the war in Gaza, including senior commanders directly involved in authorizing strikes, the Guardian spokesperson added. In recent days, the Israeli government has promoted an online film project that mimics the style of NAZA, aiming to challenge the real film’s findings. Ariel Averbuch, an Israeli attorney and army reservist who made NAZA: The Real Story, called it an “offensive move” meant to shift the world’s attention away from allegations about the Israeli military’s killing of civilians. Film industry heavyweights around the world, including the heads of the Locarno film festival, have expressed solidarity with Abraham and Szor, saying they stood “firmly in support of film-makers’ rights to pursue difficult and urgent subjects without fear of reprisal.”
Frequently Asked Questions
FAQs Netanyahus Order to Identify and Prosecute Interview Subjects in the Film The Bibi Files
1 What is this controversy about
In 2024 Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahus office reportedly pushed to identify and take legal action against Palestinians who appeared in the documentary The Bibi Files a film built largely from leaked police interrogation videos The people interviewed had spoken critically about Netanyahu
2 What is The Bibi Files
Its a 2024 documentary by director Alexis Bloom produced by Alex Gibney It uses leaked footage of Israeli police interrogations of Netanyahu and people close to him in his ongoing corruption cases plus new interviews
3 Who was ordered to be identified and prosecuted
Mainly the Palestinian interviewees in the film including former Palestinian Authority official Mohammed Dahlan and others whose faces and voices appeared in the documentary
4 Who gave the order
Reporting indicates Netanyahus office through officials acting on his behalf sought the identities of the interviewees Netanyahu himself has denied directing any such action
5 Why would Netanyahu want them prosecuted
Critics say it was an attempt to intimidate people from speaking to journalists and to retaliate against those who appeared in a film damaging to him Supporters say the concern was about leaks of classified interrogation material and possible legal violations
6 Is this legal
Its contested Israeli law protects freedom of expression but leaking police investigation materials and cooperating with foreign media can raise legal issues Whether prosecution would be justified is exactly what the dispute is about
7 Has anyone actually been prosecuted
As of the latest reporting no prosecutions of the interviewees have been confirmed The effort was reportedly about identifying them first
8 Whats the difference between identifying and prosecuting
Identifying means finding out who they are Prosecuting means formally charging them with a crime in court The first can happen without the second
9 Why does this matter for press freedom
If governments can punish people simply for being interviewed on camera sources dry up journalists cant do their jobs and the public learns less about those in power
10 Is this the first time something like this has happened
No Governments in many countries have tried to pressure or punish journalists sources What makes this notable
