Humans are vulnerable in water. Beaches have red flags, and swimming pools have bright warning signs to remind us of this, especially when all we want is to cool off during a heatwave. Pool rules are important, particularly when children are around, or when tourists aren’t familiar with local safety measures. With pictograms and lifeguards blowing whistles, swimming pools usually manage to warn people of danger without needing visitors to pass a language test at the entrance. Until now, that is.
In the eastern German city of Halle, a public swimming lake turned away visitors who didn’t speak German during one of the hottest weeks of the year. The operator of the Heidebad natural pool at Heidesee lake, Mathias Nobel, argued that people who don’t know enough German might not understand the rules and could put themselves at risk. He said that as a trained lifeguard, he recently had to rescue a small child who wasn’t wearing armbands, because the lake—a flooded former opencast mine—has a steeply sloping shoreline.
So, the new language rule might sound like a concern for public safety to some. To others, and to me, it sounds suspiciously like something else.
While it didn’t take a firm stance on this case, a spokesperson for Germany’s Federal Anti-Discrimination Agency said that denying someone access to a pool because they don’t speak German could legally be considered discrimination based on race or ethnicity. Nobel denied that the measure was racist or xenophobic.
But if safety was really the concern at Heidebad, the solutions are embarrassingly obvious. Even the city of Halle has urged the operator to drop the rule and pointed to other safety measures, like pictograms and multilingual information. The city itself has argued that ensuring safety doesn’t justify excluding entire groups of people.
That raises an uncomfortable question. If more inclusive options are readily available, why was exclusion the first choice?
A swimming pool isn’t just a place for fun. When temperatures climb above 35°C, access to water becomes a public health issue. To deny entry to people because they aren’t fluent in German isn’t a neutral act. It’s a decision about whose well-being and health matter.
This incident, and the political uproar it has caused, comes at a particularly troubling time. Halle is in Saxony-Anhalt, where campaigning has started ahead of state elections in September. The far-right Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) is expected to dominate the race, and polls suggest it’s close to winning a majority of seats in the state assembly. For the past decade, migration has been the central topic of every political debate in eastern Germany. The line between “citizens” and “foreigners,” between those who belong and those who are merely tolerated, is increasingly drawn in public life.
So it’s no surprise that the pool’s entry policy was immediately backed by the AfD. On Tuesday, the party created its own swimming pool sign, saying: “Those who don’t understand German, stay out.” While the pool operator might argue that his ban was also for the safety of non-German speakers, the AfD shamelessly portrays them as the danger. If the dog whistle wasn’t loud enough, the sign is shown in a montage next to three Middle Eastern men. Get it?
The city of Halle has a recent and painful history of violence against marginalized groups. In 2019, a far-right extremist tried to carry out a massacre at a synagogue on Yom Kippur. When he couldn’t get inside, he killed two people: one outside the synagogue and another at a nearby kebab shop. The attack was shocking, but it also revealed the deadly consequences of an atmosphere where certain groups are constantly portrayed as burdens.
This context gives the Heidebad incident a darker meaning. As German history has shown, a societyRarely does society leap from peaceful coexistence to outright violence in a single step. Instead, countless small acts of exclusion slowly chip away at our sense of community and shared public life, until discrimination starts to feel like common sense.
Skip past newsletter promotion
Free newsletter | Weekly
Sign up to This is Europe
The most pressing stories and debates for Europeans – from identity to economics to the environment
Preview latest
Enter your email
Sign up
After newsletter promotion
German swimming lake criticised for ban on non-German speakers
Read more
For years, public debate in Germany has repeatedly turned swimming pools into symbolic battlegrounds over migration and integration. In 2016, a swimming pool in Bornheim temporarily banned male refugees after allegations of sexual harassment. Critics warned at the time that such measures punished innocent people while justifying racial profiling.
Every summer, isolated incidents involving migrants are blown up by the press and social media into national debates. The idea that certain groups need special surveillance and restrictions keeps coming back in different forms. And every summer, there are plenty of Germans insisting that what they’re seeing has nothing to do with racism.
With its fake “German speakers only” sign, the AfD makes it clear that the case in Halle was never really about safety. The real issue was about who German institutions are willing to make life harder for – because putting up multilingual signs takes effort, but turning away migrants only requires suspicion.
Picture the scene at the entrance of a crowded outdoor pool during a heatwave. Some people are waved through. Others are questioned as if they’re at a border checkpoint. They’re asked to prove they belong, to show they have the right to cool down. This might make you shudder. But a growing number of German voters will picture this and nod in approval, seeing it as a desirable future for their country.
Fatma Aydemir is a Berlin-based author, novelist, playwright and a Guardian Europe columnist
Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
Frequently Asked Questions
Here is a list of FAQs based on the scenario described covering the core dispute and the warning signs it raises
General The Dispute
Q What is the dispute in Halle about
A A disagreement about whether people need to speak German in order to use a public swimming pool to cool off Some people argue that pool rules should require German while others see this as discriminatory
Q Why would someone say you need to speak German to go swimming
A Usually the argument is about enforcing integration or maintaining order The idea is that if people cant understand lifeguard instructions or basic pool rules in German it creates a safety or communication problem
Q Is speaking German an actual rule at the pool in Halle
A Not officially The dispute is about whether such a rule should exist Its a social and political argument not a current written policy
The Warning Signs
Q What are the warning signs mentioned in the headline
A The warning signs refer to the idea that this demand is often a cover for xenophobia or racism It singles out nonGerman speakers and turns a simple act like swimming into a political or exclusionary test
Q How is this a warning sign for discrimination
A Because it targets people based on language which is closely tied to nationality and ethnicity It suggests that only German speakers are welcome in a public space which excludes people who are legally living in or visiting Germany
Q Doesnt the pool have a right to make safety rules in German
A Yes they can post rules in German But banning people who dont speak German is a huge step beyond that Lifeguards can use hand signals universal symbols or basic English to communicate safety instructions
Practical Common Sense
Q What if someone cant understand an emergency announcement
A Thats a valid safety concern but the solution isnt a language ban Better solutions include multilingual signs pictograms or having staff who can use simple gestures
Q Can I go for a swim in Germany if I only speak English
