Tha an teacsa a chaidh a thoirt seachad na chòd CSS, chan e rosg, agus mar sin chan urrainnear a sgrìobhadh a-rithist gu Beurla shruthail gun a bhrìgh atharrachadh. Ma thogras tu, is urrainn dhomh mìneachadh dè a nì an CSS ann am Beurla shìmplidh.Seo an teacsa air a sgrìobhadh a-rithist ann am Beurla shruthail, nàdarra:
Airson eileamaidean figcaption, suidhich am position gu absolute le !important agus an leud as motha de 140px. Aig leud as lugha de 81.25em, bu chòir figcaptions taobh a-staigh figearan showcase taobh a-staigh #maincontent, #feature-article-container, #standard-article-container, agus #comment-article-container a bhith air an leud as motha de 220px.
Airson eileamaidean immersive, suidhich an leud gu calc(100vw - var(--scrollbar-width, 0px)), le margin-left aig -10px !important, margin-right aig 0 !important, agus left aig 0. Aig leud as lugha de 30em, suidhich margin-left gu -20px !important, agus thoir dha figcaptions padding inline de 20px. Aig leud as lugha de 46.25em, suidhich margin-left gu -20px agus leud as motha de 738px. Aig leud as lugha de 61.25em, suidhich leud as motha de 978px. Aig leud as lugha de 71.25em, suidhich leud as motha de 1098px agus margin-left gu -160px !important, agus thoir air falbh padding inline bho figcaptions. Aig leud as lugha de 81.25em, suidhich leud as motha de 1258px agus margin-left gu -240px !important.
Aig leud as lugha de 71.25em, bu chòir figearan showcase taobh a-staigh [data-gu-name=body] agus taobh a-staigh .content__main-column--interactive margin-left a bhith air a shuidheachadh gu -160px !important. Aig leud as lugha de 81.25em, tha an aon riaghailt a' buntainn le margin-left air a shuidheachadh gu -240px !important.
Airson #article > article:not(.content--interactive) > .furniture-wrapper, suidhich grid-column gu 2/-2, grid-row gu 1, agus min-width gu 0. Aig leud as lugha de 61.25em, falaich a' chiad div chloinne de [data-gu-name=meta] taobh a-staigh an fhurniture wrapper, mura h-eil an clas content__meta-container_dcr aige. Airson [data-gu-name=title] > div taobh a-staigh an fhurniture wrapper, cuir 2px de padding mullaich ris. Aig leud as lugha de 71.25em, suidhich am pseudo-eileamaid :before de [data-gu-name=standfirst] gu left: 0.
Airson [data-gu-name=right-column] agus [data-gu-name=centre-rule] a tha a' leantainn an fhurniture wrapper, suidhich grid-row-start gu 2. Airson figure.element-atom taobh a-staigh [data-gu-name=body] anns a bheil #article-layout no eileamaid le id a' tòiseachadh le gv-atom-portrait, suidhich margin-block gu 0.
Suidhich .furniture-wrapper gu position: relative. Aig leud as lugha de 61.25em, dèan .furniture-wrapper na ghrid le beàrn colbh de 20px, beàrn sreath de 0, agus an teamplaid a leanas: colbhan air an ainmeachadh title-start, headline-start, meta-start, agus standfirst-start, air a leantainn le còig colbhan 1fr, an uairsin title-end, headline-end, meta-end, agus standfirst-end, an uairsin portrait-start, còig colbhan 1fr eile, agus portrait-end; sreathan air an ainmeachadh title-start agus portrait-start aig .25fr, title-end agus headline-start aig 1fr, headline-end agus standfirst-start aig .75fr, standfirst-end agus meta-start aig auto, agus meta-end agus portrait-end.
Taobh a-staigh .furniture-wrapper, cuir crìoch mullaich 1px solid a' cleachdadh var(--headerBorder) ris a' chiad div chloinne de #headline, [data-gu-name=headline], agus .headline. Suidhich #meta agus [data-gu-name=meta] gu position: relative le 2px padding mullaich agus gun iomall deas. Airson .content__standfirst taobh a-staigh .standfirst, #standfirst, no [data-gu-name=standfirst], suidhich margin-bottom gu 4px. Airson nithean liosta taobh a-staigh nan soithichean standfirst sin, suidhich font-size gu 20px. Airson ceanglaichean taobh a-staigh nan soithichean standfirst sin, thoir air falbh am border-bottom agus background-image (le !important), agus cuir fo-loidhne an sàs le othail de 6px.Tha an teacsa a chaidh a thoirt seachad na chòd CSS, chan e rosg, agus mar sin chan urrainnear a sgrìobhadh a-rithist gu Beurla shruthail gun a bhrìgh atharrachadh. Ma thogras tu, is urrainn dhomh mìneachadh dè a nì an còd ann am Beurla shìmplidh.Airson dithis neach-naidheachd a chaitheas uimhir de thìde a' grunnachadh tro dhoimhneachd shalaich inntinn Dhòmhnaill Trump, tha coltas iongantach air a bhith aca. Michael Wolff, eachdraiche an 45mh agus an 47mh ceann-suidhe, agus Joanna Coles, prìomh oifigear cruthachail is susbaint an Daily Beast, an impis an 168mh prògram den phod-chraoladh aca a tha gu math mòr-chòrdte, Inside Trump's Head, a chlàradh. A-nis anns a' 15mh mìos aige, tha an taisbeanadh trì tursan san t-seachdain a' tarraing luchd-èisteachd a tha a' fàs fhad 's a bhios e a' sgrùdadh a' mheasgachaidh shònraich aig Trump de mhegalomania, narcissism, agus acras do-chasgaichte airson cliù. Tha sinn nar suidhe ann an oifis Coles air a' chòigeamh làr de thogalach IAC, an structar coltach ri bàta le Frank Gehry ann am Manhattan far a bheil prìomh-oifis an Daily Beast. Tha Coles, air a sgeadachadh gu geur mar a bhiodh dùil bho iar-oide air Project Runway—ann am brògan craiceann nathair, jeans, agus seacaid gheal—a' faighinn a falt geal àbhaisteach air a chur air dòigh airson a' chamara. A bheil Dòmhnall Trump a' buannachadh a chogaidh an aghaidh nam meadhanan? Leugh barrachd Tha Wolff, a tha air e fhèin a sgeadachadh nas motha anns a' mhoA country gentleman in a sumptuous brown corduroy suit (of which more later) seizes on the hair arranging to unleash his own trademark: the Wolff monologue. View image in fullscreen Joanna Coles: 'We go deep into the dark matter inside Trump's head.' Photograph: Dina Litovsky/The Guardian "I don't have any hair," he laments. "I used to. You should see the author photo of my first book – I looked like a 70s porn star, heavy moustache and heavy hair. All gone now …" The pair are fond of ending each other's sentences. And they bicker a lot, like those long-married couples in When Harry Met Sally. "Do be quiet!" Coles snaps at him in a mock schoolma'am's voice. "She really was a kind of pest," he snipes back, recalling the early days of their friendship. Underneath the crotchety patina, though, it's clear they adore each other. In the fickle world of Trump-focused media, the Daily Beast's podcast seems to be enjoying an enduring appeal. Since its launch in August 2025, its audience in audio form has tripled to 1.5m downloads a month, while it now exceeds 5m monthly full-episode views on YouTube. The lion's share of its supporters are in the US, but it also has a healthy following in Canada, the UK and Australia. Part cod psychology, part celebrity gossip, part Shakespearean tragedy, the podcast leads us to places that more traditional Trump reporting rarely goes. The title is indicative. As Coles puts it, "we go deep into the dark matter inside Trump's head". The 168th episode, whose recording I attend, takes in Trump's belligerent UN general assembly speech happening that day and his later fawning reception of China's President Xi Jinping. But it is fair to say that fans of the podcast don't come to it for geopolitical analysis. An average episode will delve into such matters as: the defenestration of senior women in his administration, including the short-lived press secretary Katie Zacharia and ambassador to Greece, Kimberly Guilfoyle; Trump's weight (they call him the "all-you-can-eat president"); Melania's mysterious disappearing act (Wolff and the first lady have form, having locked horns in a long-running legal dispute); and the outsized role of executive assistant Natalie Harp, whom Wolff flagged as an issue well before the White House correspondents' pack. View image in fullscreen The hosts of Inside Trump's Head are fond of ending each other's sentences. Photograph: Dina Litovsky/The Guardian They have also tackled the portentous question: does the president wear diapers? "There was no odor that surrounded him," Wolff revealed in one show, drawing on his olfactory reporting skills from when he trailed after Trump during the 2024 presidential campaign. There is no mincing of words in the pod, no on-the-one-hand-this-on-the-other-hand-that. Coles brings the sharpness of her Fleet Street training to bear in analysing Trump, as well as her skills as a forensic interviewer well-versed in the seamier side of celebrity lifestyles. Wolff can inject the observations of a book and magazine writer and the knowledge he gained from the extraordinary access given to him at the start of the era, when he was invited to spend weeks inside the first Trump White House. His language on the podcast is spicy. Wolff has variously described Trump on air as "that fat fucker" and a "fucking asshole", while Coles likes to highlight what she is convinced is the president's declining mental faculties. Trump's top team returns fire with equal gusto. Steven Cheung, the White House communications director, has on umpteen occasions slammed Wolff as "a lying sack of shit" and a "fraud", while Coles is a "retard" and a "blithering idiot". Faced with such blowback, the duo are unapologetic about their choice of subjects or words, dismissing Cheung's attacks as "performative". "We talk how people talk“We’re going to get through this, yes,” he says, starting his final monologue. “I truly believe there will never be another Donald Trump. When he’s gone, everyone will breathe a sigh of relief—even Republicans.” He’s not finished yet. “It’s fascinating. Nobody except his fanbase likes this guy. I mean, Trump is a fat fuck, even to those closest to him.”
Frequently Asked Questions
Heres a set of FAQs based on the topic
1 What does it mean to immerse yourself in Trumps mess 247
It means constantly following Trumprelated news controversies and political drama checking feeds alerts and clips throughout the day as a deliberate choice rather than casual interest
2 Why do some people say this constant immersion is necessary
They argue that staying informed is a civic duty that the stakes are too high to look away and that ignoring the news feels like complicity or losing ground to misinformation
3 Who are these people typically
Journalists political researchers activists and highly engaged citizens often people whose work or identity is tied to politics media or advocacy
4 What are the benefits of staying this immersed
Fast awareness of developments strong media literacy through repetition the ability to spot misinformation quickly and readiness for conversations or work that depend on current events
5 What are the common problems with it
Burnout anxiety doomscrolling sleep disruption and a distorted sense that everything is a crisis It can also crowd out relationships hobbies and deep work
6 What is doomscrolling and how is it related
Doomscrolling is compulsively scrolling through bad news Its the habit that often turns staying informed into immersing yourself 247
7 Is constant news consumption actually good for democracy
Moderate intentional engagement helps Nonstop immersion doesnt studies link heavy news consumption to anxiety and fatigue which can reduce effective participation rather than increase it
8 Whats a real example of this behavior
Refreshing a news app during dinner watching three reaction videos to the same headline or setting alerts for every political development even on vacation
9 How is this different from regular news reading
Regular reading is bounded you check in learn and move on Immersion is unbounded its always on emotionally charged and hard to stop
10 What practical tips help people stay informed without burning out
Set fixed checkin times use curated summaries instead of endless feeds mute nonurgent alerts take newsfree hours and ask will this matter in a week before clicking
Bidh iad gan tumadh fhèin ann an ùpraid Trump 24/7. Tha iad ag ràdh gu bheil e riatanach.
